cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicola...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Make ProcessingException extend CascadingRuntimeException
Date Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:53:25 GMT
Ugo Cei wrote:

> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
>> In any case (and note that this is a vote, not a veto) the main reason 
>> is that in doing this we risk to throw out the baby with the water: I 
>> prefer a lot to remove ProcessingExceptions comptely and have the 
>> Cocoon components throw all the exceptions that the container can and 
>> will handle. IOW, I don't want to have an implicit contract but a more 
>> detailed and explicit one. In any case, generic ProcessingExceptions 
>> are evil, and this is a fact that we have known for a long time.
> 
> We have something worse than generic ProcessingExceptions being thrown, 
> we have components throwing CascadingException. Which not only force 
> clients to check them, but create an unnecessary dependence on Avalon.

Whaich I agree with, but still it's not about checked VS unchecked.

> And I'm not going to throw out any baby. I'm going to throw out lots of 
> totally useless "catch" clauses that do nothing but litter the code.

You don't need to use unchecked exceptions to do that. I don't see the 
connection.

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message