Leo Sutic wrote:
>
> > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
> >
> > So, if I understand you correctly, the only difference is
> that I can
> > get an exception that I wasn't prepared to get when using Avalon.
>
> Yep, that's pretty much it.
>
> > If that's try then I don't see any reason why this wouldn't
> work with
> > using the Avalon interfaces - I'm just speaking of the
> interfaces not
> > the implementation!
>
> It will work, but the thing is that people have started
> assuming that some things will work in certain ways.
>
> So while the interfaces will work in practice, they won't in
> theory, since there are some semantics that are gone.
>
Okay, I see - so as long as I don't reload a block, it's pretty
much the same.
Thanks, Leo!
Carsten
|