cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "roy huang" <lingererhu...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: [RT] - XUL revisited....
Date Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:57:11 GMT
The XUL link bring a impressed application. But yes,90%(even more in my country) use IE,and
it's almost impossible to persuade user throw IE away.But to developers or administrators
it is different.Using Flash may offer great UI but still has some shortcoming: much slower
compare standard html or XUL.So I +1 for flash rendering ,but my suggestion is why convert
cocoon forms sample Form Model GUI to a complete XUL application enable developers and administrators
to create cocoon form define,data binding and template?If it's a success application,many
developers using cocoon may consider using XUL as special application UI or even more.
WDYT?
Roy Huang
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sylvain Wallez" <sylvain@apache.org>
To: <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] - XUL revisited....


> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> 
> >Hi:
> >
> >I was revisiting the XUL website and found something great:
> >
> >http://mab.mozdev.org/
> >
> >I am seriously thinking in XUL as the final code from forms block. I know XUL only
works in Mozilla, but if we have the control of all the users machines, XUL can be the best
choice. Think in a rich client without the fat of Java Applets. ;-)
> >  
> >
> 
> "if we have the control"... Unfortunately, 90% of people out there use IE...
> 
> But a featureful XUL implementation of the CForms styling would 
> certainly help to convince people trashing IE and going for Mozilla!
> 
> So +1 for a XUL styling.
> 
> Sylvain
> 
> -- 
> Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
> http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
> { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
> 
> 
Mime
View raw message