Upayavira wrote:
> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>
<snip />
>>
>> So now the vote:
>>
>> [ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
>> [+1] include.block.blockname=true|false
>>
is my vote too...
>> Joerg
>>
>>
> Exclude always seemed really odd to a native English speaker. It was
> always the wrong way around.
>
> Upayavira
>
>
well, imagine trying to figure it out if you're not a native English
speaker :-)
in any case: this will be rather bath news for people that have adopted
to this scheme:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=YourCocoonBasedProjectAnt16
just because they want an easy swap from 2.1.x to current cvs-head and
back if needed...
have to think about a flexible way out for those, hints and tips welcome...
only thing I can figure now is for those people to have both exclude.**
and include.** props in their local.build.properties so they get the
same kind of build result
regards,
-marc=
--
Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/
mpo@outerthought.org mpo@apache.org
|