cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <>
Subject RE: [VOTE RESULTS] Make ProcessingException extend CascadingRunti meException
Date Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:55:22 GMT
I don't believe all apache projects are required to follow those voting
procedures.  However, I can't think of a good reason why not to.  If someone
is trusted enough to be a committer I would hope they would have the common
sense to use their veto power judiciously.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ugo Cei [] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Make ProcessingException extend

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Ugo Cei wrote:


"Under normal (non-lazy consensus) conditions, the proposal requires 
three positive votes and no negative ones in order to pass; [...]
For code-modification votes, +1 votes are in favour of the proposal, but 
-1 votes are vetos  and kill the proposal dead until all vetoers 
withdraw their -1 votes."

Doesn't this apply to this vote?


View raw message