cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <>
Subject RE: Continue Development of 2.1.x
Date Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:38:34 GMT
Don't worry.  It takes a lot to shut me up. :)

I think we in general agreement.


-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Ziegeler [] 
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: Continue Development of 2.1.x

> However, I am not a Cocoon committer, so it really isn't up 
> to me to say how the respository is organized.  
But you belong to the Cocoon community and we really value everyone's
opinion. It doesn't mean that a committer is always right. So,
please keep on posting your comments and suggestions. Really

> But as a user 
> of Cocoon I care greatly about how I am going to be able to 
> maintain it after my system goes live.  I'd prefer not to 
> have to freeze it at a particular point release and perform 
> hand patches after that.
Yes, I totally understand that and as I said, in general I agree
but the changes I mentioned should really be harmless. 
Remember, that most of us committers are users, too. 
E.g. we (s&n, my employer :) ) are using Cocoon in many projects
ranging from small to very big installations and we don't want
to change our applications just because we are upgrading from
let's say 2.1.4 to 2.1.5.

So, in the end, I think, yes, all 2.1.x versions should in general be 
compatible but there should be (as always) exceptions to this


View raw message