Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34394 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 07:56:26 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 07:56:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 1717 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 07:56:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 1659 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 07:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 1642 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 07:55:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.s-und-n.de) (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 07:55:59 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 3B47619F642 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:56:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.54]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 6.5) with ESMTP id 2004030808504429-85971 ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:50:44 +0100 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Locks within AbstractReadWriteStore Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:58:13 +0100 Organization: S&N AG MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcQE4X8dToAspstPQg6COUlXkT4mvwAAXggw X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 6.5|September 26, 2003) at 08.03.2004 08:50:44, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 6.5|September 26, 2003) at 08.03.2004 08:50:44, Serialize complete at 08.03.2004 08:50:44 Message-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Corin Moss wrote: > > JCS certainly has an implementation of a r/w lock: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/jcs/xref/org/apache/jcs/util > s/locking/ > ReadWriteLock.html > > The indexed disk cache certainly uses it, as I suspect does > any other cache which needs such a thing. So I guess we > should be fine to remove the A-R-W dependency? > Yes. > It's worth noting that JCS even implements a r/w lock for its > JISP implementation, where JISP doesn't do such a thing on its own. :) > > Does this require a vote? :) No, such changes doesn't require a vote. So you can just go ahead. Carsten