Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-57219-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 29286 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 15:07:50 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 15:07:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 5257 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2004 15:07:41 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5202 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2004 15:07:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5182 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 15:07:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO otsrv1.iic.ugent.be) (157.193.121.51)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 15:07:40 -0000
Received: from [192.168.123.115] (host115 [192.168.123.115])
	by otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i29F7fO14371
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:07:41 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
In-Reply-To: <404DDBE0.1080600@s-und-n.de>
References: <4049F275.5000906@apache.org> <404DA633.6010306@apache.org>
 <5DFD0EA4-71BB-11D8-9FA2-000A958B684A@outerthought.org>
 <404DB5BD.5030500@apache.org> <404DBF2A.9060703@apache.org>
 <404DC35C.80804@reverycodes.com> <404DC793.8080408@s-und-n.de>
 <404DCA3D.1060807@reverycodes.com> <404DD804.70008@vafer.org>
 <404DDBE0.1080600@s-und-n.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <82848D7C-71DB-11D8-9FA2-000A958B684A@outerthought.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org>
Subject: Re: [CocoonForms] END of code freeze
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:07:40 +0100
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612)
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 09 Mar 2004, at 15:59, Guido Casper wrote:

> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> Shouldn't one be able to keep the old block
>> and use 2.1.5-dev? ...as an interim solution?
>
> Yes, I can live with that. But I think it's not a good sign for our 
> users. A user should have a chance to migrate while using a released 
> version.

+1 - and I think most of us who have production users will agree with 
that. I don't want to slow down the process, but also don't want to 
lose users by force-feeding them migration work they haven't catered 
for. This is just a temporary solution, and in due time new features 
will emerge from the official cforms branch that will make them do the 
switch at their own pace.

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML            An Orixo Member
Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org