Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63609 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 14:32:44 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 14:32:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 12575 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 14:32:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12383 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 14:32:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12364 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 14:32:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO adicia.telenet-ops.be) (195.130.132.56) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 14:32:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 79A9C1F7061 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:32:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (D5E0AAD9.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.170.217]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E5E1F710B for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:32:38 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) In-Reply-To: <404C47F9.2090409@apache.org> References: <404BE18A.7030208@verizon.net> <54F0544A-70DA-11D8-8033-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> <404C47F9.2090409@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <764512EA-710D-11D8-9EC8-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steven Noels Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Rhino-with-continuations packages Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:32:44 +0100 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 08 Mar 2004, at 11:16, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Very good point. It cannot be the ASF, and cocoondev.org isn't a legal > entity that can hold a copyright. Considering that rhino+cont's single > author is Chris, he could be the copyright holder, but community-wise > this doesn't sound good. > > And in the same area, what will be (or can be) its license? Is it > possible to relicense the fork or should we keep MPL? IIRC, MPL 1.0 is tainted - 1.1 is not. And Rhino consists of source code with a variety of license headers attached: a legal mess IMO. Maybe we should ask for a to-be-forked donation from Mozilla to get a "legally stable" snapshot to work upon. My personal problem though is that I have a bit of an ethical issue asking for a (donation) favor from an open source community, knowing that we won't properly community-shepherd their code anyhow - preferring our own fork for obvious reasons. > Anyway, I'm +1 for the renaming, which, since the fork does exist, > will make it clear and visible, along with solving the technical > problems in WS and WL. Maybe we could rename it into "Cocoon Scripting Engine" while we are at it - as this seems to be a common usage pattern. ;-) -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML An Orixo Member Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org