Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72625 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 07:43:38 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 07:43:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 24573 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 07:43:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 24515 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 07:43:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 24494 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 07:43:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos) (62.116.51.59) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 07:43:10 -0000 Received: From mail.at.efp.cc ([62.116.51.60]) by kerberos (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1080805400202; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:43:20 +0200 Received: from apache.org (wrpo.at.intra.efp.cc [194.107.80.246]) by mail.at.efp.cc (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id i317hIK02813 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:43:20 +0200 Message-ID: <406BC7BE.5020106@apache.org> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 09:41:50 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Reinhard_P=F6tz?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULT] javaflow References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >Torsten Curdt wrote: > > >>>Is the block disabled by default? >>> >>> >>no not yet ...would you prefer this >>also for the dev version or only for >>the release? >> >> > >I personally would prefer to disable it already for >the dev version as many users are trying out Cocoon >from the CVS and then only use later on a released >version as a reference. >And it definitly makes releasing Cocoon easier. I think >it's very easy to forget to disable the block during >the release process. > >But I also guess, I'm again the only one with this >opinion :( > >Carsten > > no. +1 from me ;-) -- Reinhard