Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71596 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2004 09:05:30 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2004 09:05:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 66581 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2004 09:05:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 66526 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2004 09:05:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 66505 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2004 09:05:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO adina.local) (81.174.11.87) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2004 09:05:01 -0000 Received: from apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by adina.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB9F1CEC80 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:05:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40693843.5010306@apache.org> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:05:07 +0200 From: Gianugo Rabellino User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Macintosh/20040208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move javaflow into scratchpad was RE: cvs commit: coco on-2.1/src/blocks/javaflow References: <31DF72A980E5D511B48C000102BD8685061DB2E0@calexc01.diginsite.com> In-Reply-To: <31DF72A980E5D511B48C000102BD8685061DB2E0@calexc01.diginsite.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ralph Goers wrote: > Second, at first I liked the idea of disabling unstable blocks by default, > but after looking at blocks.properties I get the feeling that all that would > do is make it a pain to get the sample site working, unless the build was > changed to use a samples.blocks.properties to build the sample site. > Blocks.properties clearly identifies the unstable blocks so I don't think > that is a problem. Except that practically no one is reading it: have a look at INSTALL.txt, most people will read just the first section, and there is no mention whatsoever of unstable stuff. Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com (Blogging at: http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)