Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55047 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 18:44:57 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 18:44:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 40442 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2004 18:44:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 40401 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2004 18:44:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 40329 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 18:44:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 18:44:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 14619 invoked by uid 65534); 29 Mar 2004 18:44:42 -0000 Received: from a183069.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (EHLO gmx.de) (139.18.183.69) by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 20:44:42 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3483660 Message-ID: <40686E9B.1000604@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:44:43 +0200 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: java continuations References: <40682501.3010806@vafer.org> <40686BDB.4050804@gmx.de> <1080585572.2656.87.camel@verndeb> In-Reply-To: <1080585572.2656.87.camel@verndeb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 29.03.2004 20:39, Stephan Michels wrote: >>Hmm, 4h for a vote was a bit short, wasn't it? So just for the records: >>I'm with Antonio and so like JFlow vs. JSFlow. > > > I know, I know, sorry about that, guys. I was very impatient. I could > revert it if you want. Not because of my comment. If the vote majority will shift to another name instead of javaflow we can still move it around. If Carsten does not insist on his -1 including a removal I would let it at the place where it is at the moment. Joerg