Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37984 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 15:50:32 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 15:50:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 53011 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2004 15:50:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 52961 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2004 15:50:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 52834 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 15:50:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dd2020.kasserver.com) (81.209.148.130) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 15:50:20 -0000 Received: from vafer.org (pD9E2D803.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.216.3]) by dd2020.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA704B03E for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:49:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <40572303.8090409@vafer.org> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:53:39 +0100 From: Torsten Curdt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: form framework clean up References: <4051A5AD.5020103@vafer.org> <4056FC74.8000108@vafer.org> <405715C4.7060103@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <405715C4.7060103@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >>>>> I asked over a cocoon-user. Up til now 100% of them are saying >>>>> remove it *now*. (about 17 users responded) It was clearly stated >>>>> the vast amount of options lead more to confusion than they are >>>>> helpful. ...as we already know :) >>>>> >>>>> If noone objects I'll remove both blocks either tonight or tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I would say, just wait some more days. We have to remove the blocks >>>> before the next release. So it actually doesn't matter if we >>>> remove it today or next week. But waiting just some more days >>>> might give users that are reading the list only from time to time >>>> to answer as well. >>>> >>>> Apart from that: blast it! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> alright >> >> >> >> a few day later - no further answers >> ...so we are still at 100% >> >> If noone objects... (see above ;) >> -- >> Torsten >> >> > Please don't forget to mention it our step in the documents. You mean adding a "removed since 2.1.5" to the wiki docu? -- Torsten