Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37702 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2004 22:11:57 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2004 22:11:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 13231 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2004 22:11:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12952 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2004 22:11:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12934 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2004 22:11:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2004 22:11:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 19332 invoked by uid 65534); 12 Mar 2004 22:11:46 -0000 Received: from a183069.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (EHLO gmx.de) (139.18.183.69) by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 12 Mar 2004 23:11:46 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3483660 Message-ID: <405235B5.4090202@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:12:05 +0100 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Using Maven (or something similar) for dependencies? (Was: Co coon's Rhino+continuations fork) References: <31DF72A980E5D511B48C000102BD8685061DB296@calexc01.diginsite.com> <4051EB3A.1030809@vafer.org> In-Reply-To: <4051EB3A.1030809@vafer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 12.03.2004 17:54, Torsten Curdt wrote: > Wait, wait, wait... from what I understand you may! > ...but *you* would have take care to respect all the > licenses that are included in this redistribution > by *yourself*! Seems like the ASF wants to step back > not covering the risk anymore. But if that's true what's the right to exist for the ASF from just the legal point of view? They break exactly this part what made it popular to use Apache stuff: mostly no risk through any legal issues. These copyright and license issues can really jam all the (open source) software development - but what happens when they introduce software patents additionally in Europe? Joerg