Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Message-ID: <40520306.5090400@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:35:50 +0100
From: Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1 status.xml
References: <20040312033140.78009.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
 <4051B400.4000007@reverycodes.com>
In-Reply-To: <4051B400.4000007@reverycodes.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Vadim wrote:

 >> Hello Vadim,
 >>
 >> as I can not reply to your mail (gmane does not list those mails
 >> replying to a mail on cvs@c.a.o) I answer with an extra mail for now:

Now moving it back to list.

 >>>>  +  <!-- important note: the row-path is used inside
 >>>> jxpath-createPath context,
 >>>>  +       as a consequence it cannot have dependent children or
 >>>> predicates -->
 >>>
 >>> Why did you change that? Currently in my application I have:
 >>>     row-path="member[position() < 3]"
 >>>     row-path=".[member/gender = 'female']"
 >>>     row-path=".[count(../member) > 1]"
 >>>     row-path="member[id != $id]"
 >>>
 >>> and list goes on. With your change, this app won't work anymore. So
 >>> what do I do in this position?
 >>
 >> Are you refering directly to the comment? I did not add it, I just
 >> moved it around.
 >
 > Ok, can you at least tell me whether above example row-paths will work
 > with this new CForms or not?

AFAIU/K it's a limitation of JXPath and has nothing to do with 
Woody/CForms. This should mean if it works til now it will work in 
future. Maybe you have provided an additional @row-path-insert?

I also found this issue when reading the threads about repeater 
bindings, but don't no more which and who exactly:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106976455300001&r=1&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107049618519927&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107050821100002&r=1&w=2

Maybe Marc can tell us more about it. And maybe you can just test the 
upgrade task and test it with cforms :) I will add a stylesheet for the 
changed syntax to it too.

Joerg