Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99521 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2004 11:54:24 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2004 11:54:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 31530 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2004 11:54:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 31319 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2004 11:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 31301 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2004 11:54:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dd2020.kasserver.com) (81.209.148.130) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2004 11:54:20 -0000 Received: from vafer.org (p50865CEC.dip.t-dialin.net [80.134.92.236]) by dd2020.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF49649393 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:53:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4051A5AD.5020103@vafer.org> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:57:33 +0100 From: Torsten Curdt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: form framework clean up References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >>I asked over a cocoon-user. Up til now 100% of them are >>saying remove it *now*. (about 17 users responded) It was >>clearly stated the vast amount of options lead more to >>confusion than they are helpful. ...as we already know :) >> >>If noone objects I'll remove both blocks either tonight or tomorrow. >> >>WDYT? > > > I would say, just wait some more days. We have to remove the blocks > before the next release. So it actually doesn't matter if we > remove it today or next week. But waiting just some more days > might give users that are reading the list only from time to time > to answer as well. > > Apart from that: blast it! alright -- Torsten