Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35952 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2004 12:32:24 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 12:32:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 77473 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2004 12:32:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 77401 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2004 12:32:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 77385 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2004 12:32:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dd2020.kasserver.com) (81.209.148.130) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 12:32:18 -0000 Received: from vafer.org (pD9E2D914.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.217.20]) by dd2020.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10E17E1E2 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:31:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <404F0B94.6030202@vafer.org> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:35:32 +0100 From: Torsten Curdt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: form framework clean up References: <4603E7E4-71DB-11D8-B5A4-000393CFE402@apache.org> <404DE248.5060709@apache.org> <1078912189.2221.6.camel@verndeb> <404EF1F1.7040705@vafer.org> <404F002B.4050303@hippo.nl> <404F0203.5060904@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <404F0203.5060904@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 10.03.2004 12:46, Unico Hommes wrote: > >>>> BTW, what about xmlform and jxforms. Are they still necessary?! >>>> Perhaps its time for some clean up. >>> >>> >>> Sounds like a good idea. But I guess we have to deprecate >>> them first like we do with the former-woody block now. >>> >> xmlform has already been deprecated for quite a while now. I think it >> is safe to remove it. > > > It's only half a year: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107662678916017&w=4. > > I would deprecate jxforms block now and remove both for 2.2 (which is > infact just a non-update to real blocks). ...really keep it in 2.1? -- Torsten