Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10178 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2004 11:54:33 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 11:54:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 11275 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2004 11:54:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 11082 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2004 11:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 11062 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2004 11:54:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 11:54:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 29251 invoked by uid 65534); 10 Mar 2004 11:54:27 -0000 Received: from a183069.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (EHLO gmx.de) (139.18.183.69) by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 12:54:27 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3483660 Message-ID: <404F0203.5060904@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:54:43 +0100 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: form framework clean up References: <4603E7E4-71DB-11D8-B5A4-000393CFE402@apache.org> <404DE248.5060709@apache.org> <1078912189.2221.6.camel@verndeb> <404EF1F1.7040705@vafer.org> <404F002B.4050303@hippo.nl> In-Reply-To: <404F002B.4050303@hippo.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 10.03.2004 12:46, Unico Hommes wrote: >>> BTW, what about xmlform and jxforms. Are they still necessary?! >>> Perhaps its time for some clean up. >> >> Sounds like a good idea. But I guess we have to deprecate >> them first like we do with the former-woody block now. >> > xmlform has already been deprecated for quite a while now. I think it is > safe to remove it. It's only half a year: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107662678916017&w=4. I would deprecate jxforms block now and remove both for 2.2 (which is infact just a non-update to real blocks). Joerg