Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-57267-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 79085 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 18:09:08 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 18:09:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 77027 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2004 18:08:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 76981 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2004 18:08:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 76954 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 18:08:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 18:08:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 2457 invoked by uid 65534); 9 Mar 2004 18:08:58 -0000
Received: from a183069.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (EHLO gmx.de) (139.18.183.69)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 09 Mar 2004 19:08:58 +0100
X-Authenticated: #3483660
Message-ID: <404E084A.9060904@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:09:14 +0100
From: Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute on in status.xml
References: <OF0623FF58.713D0D8A-ONC1256E52.003DE1DE@sundn.de>
 <404DC31A.3020409@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <404DC31A.3020409@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 09.03.2004 14:14, Sylvain Wallez wrote:

> - do you want to add an importance="high|low|medium" attribute on 
> <action> in changes.xml?

+1 @importance or @impact

> - do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?

+0

Vadim wrote:

>  * Do you want to add a block="name" attribute on <action> in changes.xml? 

+0.5 I prefer this about the above one.

Reinhard wrote:

> I think high|low|medium should me more meaningful or in other words self-explaining. What about "newFeature", "incompatibleChange", "minorChange"?

-0.5 to special IMO.

Cheche wrote:

> Given that, why do not use the already priority attribue that has been used on <actions>, but instead of the actions elements, move it to the child element <action>?

+0.5 also a good alternative, but @priority give a bit another attitude 
than @impact/@importance.

Hope I did not miss any suggestion :)

Joerg