Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-57191-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 46376 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 13:29:30 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 13:29:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 67477 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2004 13:29:24 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67422 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2004 13:29:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67408 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 13:29:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO trinity.anyware-tech.com) (217.112.237.100)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 13:29:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 4224 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 13:29:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (10.1.0.254)
  by trinity.anyware-tech.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 13:29:23 -0000
Message-ID: <404DC6B2.8060809@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:29:22 +0100
From: Sylvain Wallez <sylvain@apache.org>
Organization: Anyware Technologies
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute on in status.xml
References: <OF0623FF58.713D0D8A-ONC1256E52.003DE1DE@sundn.de>
 <404DC31A.3020409@apache.org> <404DC447.2000608@reverycodes.com>
In-Reply-To: <404DC447.2000608@reverycodes.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>> So let's finally vote on this.
>>
>> - do you want to add an importance="high|low|medium" attribute on 
>> <action> in changes.xml?
>
>
>
> +0.5. How "importance" is defined - what is important and what is not?


Really subjective, I admit. The one that makes the change will initially 
decide for the importance, and this can be later discussed if other 
don't agree, although I don't think this will happen often.

>> - do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
>
>
>
> -0, reduces visibility.


Having a separate file doesn't mean it doesn't appear on a different 
page in the docs. Cocoon has some nice features for aggregation ;-)

> Let's do instead:
>
>  * Do you want to add a block="name" attribute on <action> in 
> changes.xml?
>
> +1


Good. The important point is to have a per-block classification, even if 
I personally prefer a per-block file.

Sylvain

-- 
Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }