Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7631 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 13:15:47 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 13:15:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 66580 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 13:15:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 66540 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 13:15:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 66488 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 13:15:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mout.perfora.net) (217.160.230.40) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 13:15:39 -0000 Received: from [217.160.230.50] (helo=smtp.perfora.net) by mout.perfora.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B0Kbb-0002AB-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 08:15:39 -0500 Received: from [208.185.179.12] (helo=reverycodes.com) by smtp.perfora.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B0Kbb-0006jD-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 08:15:39 -0500 Message-ID: <404C69C2.1040103@reverycodes.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 07:40:34 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040219 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: New main license.txt missing some info? References: <42201.10.0.0.5.1078727111.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> In-Reply-To: <42201.10.0.0.5.1078727111.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Antonio Gallardo wrote: >Hi: > >Reading the main LICENSE in Cocoon, seems like we forgot to fill this line: > >Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner] > > No. This is intentional. Please re-read paragraph above this line, and then re-read chapter 1, definition of Work. Vadim