Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Message-ID: <404C47F9.2090409@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:16:25 +0100
From: Sylvain Wallez <sylvain@apache.org>
Organization: Anyware Technologies
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Rhino-with-continuations packages
References: <404BE18A.7030208@verizon.net>
 <54F0544A-70DA-11D8-8033-000A958B684A@outerthought.org>
In-Reply-To: <54F0544A-70DA-11D8-8033-000A958B684A@outerthought.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Steven Noels wrote:

> On 08 Mar 2004, at 03:59, Christopher Oliver wrote:
>
>> In order to allow the use of Flowscript on the BEA Weblogic and IBM 
>> Websphere application servers (and possibly in other environments) I 
>> propose that we rename the Rhino packages from org.mozilla to 
>> org.cocoondev.
>
>
> Who will be the copyright holder?


Very good point. It cannot be the ASF, and cocoondev.org isn't a legal 
entity that can hold a copyright. Considering that rhino+cont's single 
author is Chris, he could be the copyright holder, but community-wise 
this doesn't sound good.

And in the same area, what will be (or can be) its license? Is it 
possible to relicense the fork or should we keep MPL?

Anyway, I'm +1 for the renaming, which, since the fork does exist, will 
make it clear and visible, along with solving the technical problems in 
WS and WL.

Sylvain

-- 
Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }