Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39896 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 08:07:43 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 08:07:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 10295 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 08:07:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 10017 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 08:07:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 10003 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 08:07:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cbim.it) (212.131.130.82) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 08:07:16 -0000 Received: from cuprouter.cbim.it (cuprouter.cbim.it [192.168.4.10]) by mail.cbim.it (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i288ZfC14622 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:35:41 +0100 Received: from cbim.it (caterina.cbim.it [192.168.4.42]) by cuprouter.cbim.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA01396 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:08:15 +0100 Message-ID: <404C29B5.1050106@cbim.it> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 09:07:17 +0100 From: Ugo Cei Organization: C.B.I.M. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Rhino-with-continuations packages References: <404BE18A.7030208@verizon.net> <42160.10.0.0.5.1078726209.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> In-Reply-To: <42160.10.0.0.5.1078726209.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Antonio Gallardo wrote: > This mean another "official" forking of the Rhino engine. That also mean > users of BEA and IBM AS will have 2 flowscript engine there, right? The > current deployed with org.mozilla.* and our one org.cocoondev.* > > This can be easily traduced in more memory usage, etc. Is this correct? > > Currently, I am -0 because of these concerns. If I understand correctly, without this change, Weblogic and Websphere users won't be able to use continuations at all (and maybe even flowscript), so the point about more memory usage sounds moot, doesn't it? Besides, if you're running either WL or WS and you're paying either the license fees or the army of consultants that it takes to run them properly, you wouldn't mind a few bucks for a couple extra RAM modules ;-). Ah, by the way, I'm +1 on what Christopher suggested. Ugo