Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91274 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2004 08:46:55 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2004 08:46:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 91859 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2004 08:46:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 91831 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2004 08:46:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 91814 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2004 08:46:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos) (62.116.51.59) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2004 08:46:26 -0000 Received: From mail.at.efp.cc ([62.116.51.60]) by kerberos (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1078389998182; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:46:38 +0100 Received: from apache.org (wrpo.at.intra.efp.cc [194.107.80.20] (may be forged)) by mail.at.efp.cc (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id i248ka705682 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:46:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4046EC9F.2080806@apache.org> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:45:19 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Reinhard_P=F6tz?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Entry level JSDK 1.4 in Cocoon 2.2 References: <35548.10.0.0.5.1078112489.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Christoph Gaffga wrote: >>The idea is to set JSDK 1.4 as the minimum supported JDK supported for the >>next major release 2.2 of Cocoon. Currently we are supporting also 1.3 but >>seems like few people is using it. >> >> > >but what about the maximum support JDK? I tried to compile with 1.5beta, but >it didn't work. So I compiled with 1.4 and let it run with 1.5. The gc ist >much better with 1.5! > > Did you solve your problems with running ant using JDK? I proposed to run Ant with a JRE < 1.5 and use the 1.5 compiler explicitly in the task of Ant. Did you try this? -- Reinhard