Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18302 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2004 11:18:16 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2004 11:18:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 72854 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2004 11:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 72790 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2004 11:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 72765 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2004 11:17:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mout.perfora.net) (217.160.230.40) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2004 11:17:44 -0000 Received: from [217.160.230.50] (helo=smtp.perfora.net) by mout.perfora.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AyUNy-0006BY-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 06:17:58 -0500 Received: from [208.185.179.12] (helo=reverycodes.com) by smtp.perfora.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AyUNy-0006yy-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 06:17:58 -0500 Message-ID: <4045BEE3.7040102@reverycodes.com> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 06:17:55 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [CForm]two question/suggestion about multi-value field References: <40448C9C.9000407@reverycodes.com> <1078256065.9530.70.camel@yum.ot> <4044F6A8.1040304@reverycodes.com> <1078300389.9530.85.camel@yum.ot> In-Reply-To: <1078300389.9530.85.camel@yum.ot> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bruno Dumon wrote: >On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 22:03, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > >>Bruno Dumon wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 14:31, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>2.Sometime we need to just display multi-value as text like >>>>> >>>>> >>>>,but I only found binding can only bind multivalue-field >>>>with multi-value(only in cvs now).Can/Should cocoon form provide >>>>multi-value binding to output widget? >>>> >>>> >>>>I think no. Why do you want to bind it to wd:output? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>I would think for the same reason one would otherwise wd:output instead >>>of wd:field. In this case one would however need a wd:multivalueOutput >>>widget. >>> >>> >>> >>Yes, but why not type=output? >> >> > >because an output widget doesn't read its value from the request. With a >normal (multivalue)field widget, the value can always be modified by >adding the appropriate request parameters. > Aha. Now this makes sense. +1 to multivalueoutput :-) Vadim