Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77114 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2004 19:57:16 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 19:57:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 28112 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2004 19:57:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 27993 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2004 19:57:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 27979 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2004 19:57:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warden.diginsite.com) (208.29.163.248) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 19:57:03 -0000 Received: from wlvims01.diginsite.com by warden.diginsite.com via smtpd (for daedalus.apache.org [208.185.179.12]) with SMTP; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:56:58 -0800 Received: from WLVIMS01 ([127.0.0.1]) by WLVIMS01.digitalinsight.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with SMTP id com for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:56:57 -0800 Received: by calexc01.diginsite.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:55:41 -0800 Message-ID: <31DF72A980E5D511B48C000102BD8685061DB271@calexc01.diginsite.com> From: Ralph Goers To: "'dev@cocoon.apache.org'" Subject: RE: SimpleFormTransformer (was: From Woody to CocoonForms) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:55:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yes. -----Original Message----- From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:joerg.heinicke@gmx.de] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:49 AM To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: SimpleFormTransformer (was: From Woody to CocoonForms) On 05.03.2004 16:57, Ralph Goers wrote: > I am not in favor of having FormValidatorAction and SimpleFormsTransformer > deprecated. They are lightweight and do the job they were intended to do. Until now the discussions about deprecating old form stuff where only about the two existing blocks and frameworks XMLForms and JXForms. I don't know about SimpleFormTransformer - is Woody/CForms in contrary really complex? Joerg