Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91399 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2004 00:41:06 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2004 00:41:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 19070 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2004 00:40:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 19052 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2004 00:40:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 19033 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2004 00:40:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2004 00:40:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 17570 invoked by uid 50); 6 Mar 2004 00:41:22 -0000 Date: 6 Mar 2004 00:41:22 -0000 Message-ID: <20040306004122.17569.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20631] - [PATCH] Support for transactions in SQLTransformer X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20631 [PATCH] Support for transactions in SQLTransformer joerg.heinicke@gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Normal |Enhancement Priority|Other |High ------- Additional Comments From joerg.heinicke@gmx.de 2004-03-06 00:41 ------- 25 votes (!) really makes it necessary to set the priority to high. David, I hope you are still listening. I want to ask you if you can provide this patch again for the recent 2.1 version (which has changed partly since your patch date) and provide it in diff form. Daniel's patch (bug #16718) was applied some time ago. Now your's can be applied as well, we only need an update on it (at least it would simplify committer's life as we had to get the changes from your old patch below by hand otherwise). Doing it additionally for 2.0 is not a must (Daniel's patch was not applied there) as its development was stopped, but if you want to do this as well, no one will stop you. We decided to release a last 2.0 release in near future, so it would not be useless. BTW, you don't need to attach the complete Java file. And we will not change the package as we want to avoid duplicate as far as possible. Thanks for your understanding, Joerg