Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59474 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 13:53:11 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 13:53:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 13203 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2004 13:53:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 13151 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2004 13:53:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 13125 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 13:53:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO otsrv1.iic.ugent.be) (157.193.121.51) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 13:53:03 -0000 Received: from [192.168.123.115] (host115 [192.168.123.115]) by otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i29Dr3O14329 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:53:03 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) In-Reply-To: <404DB5BD.5030500@apache.org> References: <4049F275.5000906@apache.org> <404DA633.6010306@apache.org> <5DFD0EA4-71BB-11D8-9FA2-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> <404DB5BD.5030500@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <15147EBF-71D1-11D8-9FA2-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Steven Noels Subject: Re: [CocoonForms] END of code freeze Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:53:02 +0100 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 09 Mar 2004, at 13:17, Reinhard P=F6tz wrote: > Steven Noels wrote: > >> On 09 Mar 2004, at 12:10, Reinhard P=F6tz wrote: >> >>> The new forms block is in CVS and Woody removed. >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> Ouch - are you sure this was needed *immediately after* the renaming?=20= >> I know this eventually needed to be done, but I would have given the=20= >> old block a grace period of at least two weeks. >> >> > > Sorry for this. I thought there was no need for the old block but if=20= > somebody needs it we can revert the removal. No sweat. It's just that I was aware of some production installations=20 living very close to the CVS HEAD edge. Thanks for your brave effort! --=20 Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML An Orixo Member Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org