Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40130 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 21:00:26 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 21:00:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 6902 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2004 21:00:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 6631 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2004 21:00:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 6615 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 21:00:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vern.chem.tu-berlin.de) (130.149.66.116) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 21:00:09 -0000 Received: from verndeb.chem.tu-berlin.de (verndeb.chem.tu-berlin.de [192.168.66.131]) by vern.chem.tu-berlin.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i2TL0Dgg002283 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:00:13 +0200 Subject: Re: Javaflow examples From: Stephan Michels To: Cocoon Developers In-Reply-To: <40688CB7.1000701@apache.org> References: <4068762D.5050400@apache.org> <406882D1.8020709@apache.org> <1080591484.2656.115.camel@verndeb> <40688CB7.1000701@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1080594022.2656.126.camel@verndeb> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:00:22 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Am Mo, den 29.03.2004 schrieb Gianugo Rabellino um 22:53: > A question, though: how much does BCEL usage impact remote debugging? Is > it possible to use a standard debugger with your modified classes? I don't know exactly how debugger work, but the LocalVariableTable and the LineNumberTable attribute should be preserved by BCEL. So, I think why not. Stephan Michels.