From dev-return-57785-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Thu Mar 18 06:29:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53951 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 06:29:48 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 06:29:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 12338 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2004 06:29:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12270 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2004 06:29:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12254 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 06:29:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos) (62.116.51.59) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 06:29:22 -0000 Received: From mail ([62.116.51.60]) by kerberos (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1079591372128; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:29:32 +0100 Received: from apache.org (wrpo.at.intra.efp.cc [194.107.80.23] (may be forged)) by mail (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id i2I6TVX18582 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:29:31 +0100 Message-ID: <40594174.3060001@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:28:04 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Reinhard_P=F6tz?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: forms vs form in woody rename References: <20827.9875027531$1079536436@news.gmane.org> <1079546474.1064.36.camel@123.13 yum.ot yum <4058B65B.9090909@gmx.de> <1079560834.1101.66.camel@123.13 yum.ot yum <4058FF96.5020803@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4058FF96.5020803@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 17.03.2004 23:00, Bruno Dumon wrote: > >> In the code, I'd use "Forms" where we would earlier have used "Woody". >> In the documentation, using "CForms" instead of Woody will probably >> clear the confusion. > > > Ok, quick poll for opinions of others: back to Forms? > > Joerg > +1 for Bruno's proposal/explanation -- Reinhard