From dev-return-57647-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Tue Mar 16 14:58:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85473 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 14:58:45 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 14:58:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 4620 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2004 14:58:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 4567 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2004 14:58:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 4445 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 14:58:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos) (62.116.51.59) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 14:58:34 -0000 Received: From mail ([62.116.51.60]) by kerberos (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1079449114660; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:58:34 +0100 Received: from apache.org (wrpo.at.intra.efp.cc [194.107.80.23]) by mail (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id i2GEwXX30656 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:58:34 +0100 Message-ID: <405715C4.7060103@apache.org> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:57:08 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Reinhard_P=F6tz?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: form framework clean up References: <4051A5AD.5020103@vafer.org> <4056FC74.8000108@vafer.org> In-Reply-To: <4056FC74.8000108@vafer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Torsten Curdt wrote: >>>> I asked over a cocoon-user. Up til now 100% of them are saying >>>> remove it *now*. (about 17 users responded) It was clearly stated >>>> the vast amount of options lead more to confusion than they are >>>> helpful. ...as we already know :) >>>> >>>> If noone objects I'll remove both blocks either tonight or tomorrow. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I would say, just wait some more days. We have to remove the blocks >>> before the next release. So it actually doesn't matter if we >>> remove it today or next week. But waiting just some more days >>> might give users that are reading the list only from time to time >>> to answer as well. >>> >>> Apart from that: blast it! >> >> >> >> alright > > > a few day later - no further answers > ...so we are still at 100% > > If noone objects... (see above ;) > -- > Torsten > > Please don't forget to mention it our step in the documents. -- Reinhard