From dev-return-56471-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Mon Mar 01 18:43:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14961 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 18:43:49 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 18:43:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 67110 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2004 18:43:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 67077 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2004 18:43:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 67064 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 18:43:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO adicia.telenet-ops.be) (195.130.132.56) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 18:43:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F74B1F71C1 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:43:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from yum.ot (D5774E46.kabel.telenet.be [213.119.78.70]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92B51F7074 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:43:39 +0100 (MET) Subject: Re: [RT] Cocoon Input Model From: Bruno Dumon To: dev@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: <40435216.60801@nada.kth.se> References: <403CC415.2020302@nada.kth.se> <403D194A.9020705@nada.kth.se> <40435216.60801@nada.kth.se> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Outerthought Message-Id: <1078166543.25666.304.camel@yum.ot> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:42:24 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:09, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > Steven Noels wrote: > > > On 25 Feb 2004, at 22:53, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > > > >> CForms should use typed DOM as "form model" > >> ------------------------------------------- > >> > >> I also believe that making CForms use typed XML as data storage is > >> important. This obviously require some changes, among other things the > >> widget objects need to be split into a control part and a storage > >> part, XML data types need support. I will return with a detailed > >> proposal in the near future (hopefully ;)). I also hope to get some > >> feedback from the people involved in CForms development. > > > > > > Yes, It will be interesting to hear the CForms developers view on it. To avoid being silent in this thread, I just wanted to mention that I'm waiting on your above mentioned proposal before commenting (because it's still to vague to me). -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center bruno@outerthought.org bruno@apache.org