cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@s-und-n.de>
Subject RE: Kernel...
Date Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:21:02 GMT
Pier Fumagalli  wrote:
> 
> On 31 Mar 2004, at 12:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> 
> > I would say: yes, add the blocks directory. It would be good if the 
> > blocks you add there are not already used in the cocoon-2.1 
> cvs, which 
> > means just use unused names.
> 
> Given that any block follows a naming such as 
> http://host/name/version, I would think that to avoid 
> complications, we could represent that structure in CVS:
> 
> /src
>    /blocks
>      /cocoon.apache.org
>        /block_name
>      /jakarta.apache.org (???)
>        /block_name
>      /www.orixo.com (???)
>        /block_name
> 
> And versions are ignored as CVS already provides versioning.
> 
+1

> Or would "our" block only be http://cocoon.apache.org/ even 
> if we "wrap" stuff from other people? (I'm thinking about 
> Jakarta Commons DBCP and POOL right now, maybe more stuff in 
> the future)
> 
Even if it will turn out later that we only have "c.a.o" blocks,
it's easier to go the more verbose way now and don't have to
change anything later on if we have others as well.

Carsten


Mime
View raw message