cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <>
Subject Re: Kernel...
Date Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:31:24 GMT
Pier Fumagalli wrote:

> On 31 Mar 2004, at 17:31, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>> I would say: yes, add the blocks directory. It would be good if the 
>>> blocks
>>> you add there are not already used in the cocoon-2.1 cvs, which means 
>>> just
>>> use unused names.
>> eheh, this is not a problem anymore since these blocks are real ones 
>> and they will identified by a URI ;-)
> To get back to the problem of URL/Namespace/identifier, I just thought 
> that for namespace (yes) we can use since a 
> namespace doesn't have to provide any actual data (can return a 404, or 
> even a IOException).

try clicking on ""

> For blocks, though, do we want to have them to point at something (like 
> the block descriptor, or the home page) or shall we ignore for now?

we *MUST* be able to serve stuff from our URI block identifiers from the 
future. it's actually the whole point in having http: based identifiers.

I think that blocks URI should be starting with because that doesn't change and also 
signifies that these URI don't represent namespaces (which will be still and will also make it easier for us to control 
that URL space when we'll need to publish the metadata in it.


View raw message