cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joerg Heinicke <>
Subject Re: [cforms] Custom Binding.
Date Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:00:58 GMT
On 31.03.2004 10:36, Marc Portier wrote:

>>> hm, if SoC is the argument, then shouldn't we consider the who is 
>>> doing what discussion?
>>> my feeling is that touching the xconf is out of question to a lot of 
>>> users? They could easily write up a custom-binding and be glad they 
>>> never need to learn about the xconf in the first place?
>> I don't know if I follow this argumentation. Having configuration 
>> splitted over multiple files might help the user at the beginning, but 
>> can lead to a nightmare at the end. But maybe I just want to do 
>> anything to perfect :)
> the only config part that would make sense on the xconf level is the 
> class-name, the rest would be local config that needs to be in the 
> binding file anyway (like you say: why scatter it around in different 
> places?)

Ok, this convinces me at least partly ;-)


View raw message