cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guido Casper <gcas...@s-und-n.de>
Subject Re: Response to workflow
Date Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:50:56 GMT
Michael Wechner wrote:
> Johan Stuyts wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> Conclusion
>> ----------
>> IMHO there should be more consensus about what is needed and what is 
>> feasible in a relatively short time, e.g. half a year to a year.
>>
>> I think building a generalized workflow based on a standard is too 
>> ambitious. Leaving out some more complex constructs decreases 
>> usability. It might be an option to choose a (proper) subset of a 
>> standard with which a large percentage (definitely more than 80%. 
>> Having to resort to another solution in one of four situations is not 
>> acceptable) of use cases can be implemented.
> 
> 
> 
> I would suggest to start on an existing code base, e.g. Lenya or 
> whatever, make
> an appropriate Cocoon block out of it (there had been a list of 
> requirements to meet)
> and start from there.

If that goes along with some documentation :-) and an isolated sample I'm +1

Guido

> Else I guess discussions just keep going forever ;-)
> 
> The existing code base might not satisfy everybody, but at least it's 
> something
> concrete to start with, even if it will be totally modified resp. 
> refactored in the end.
> 
> Michi
> 
> 

-- 
Guido Casper
-------------------------------------------------
S&N AG, Competence Center Open Source
                     Tel.: +49-5251-1581-87
Klingenderstr. 5    mailto:gcasper@s-und-n.de
D-33100 Paderborn   http://www.s-und-n.de
-------------------------------------------------

Mime
View raw message