Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
<snip/>
>
> Why (a), (b), or (c) ? There is always option of (d):
>
> d) Make it configurable on handle-errors element of the called
> pipeline. This way, behavior of redirect-to does not need to be
> changed, and this feature is more useful in general - especially in
> "portlets". Or is this feature will be subject of next vote? :)
Exactly. Making it configurable on <map:handle-errors> has been
discussed, and both are necessary, as the error handling strategy has to
be defined by the caller or the callee depending on the usage context.
This vote is about specifying the behaviour of internal redirects,
because it may change the current behaviour and can therefore cause
minor back-imcompatibilities.
Configuration of <handle-errors>, as it's a new feature, will be voted
separately ;-)
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
|