cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Unico Hommes <un...@hippo.nl>
Subject Re: [Summary] [Vote] Moving XSP into its own block
Date Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:11:39 GMT
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

>Torsten Curdt wrote:
>  
>
>>Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Unico Hommes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not the 
>>>>other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>accomplish 
>>    
>>
>>>>I'd prefer keeping it the way it is now. I will do some 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>research as to 
>>    
>>
>>>>what would be involved to change the build system to 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>accomodate this.
>>    
>>
>>>But this then makes removing xsp more difficult :) I really think
>>>we should keep all xsp related stuff in one place. This makes the
>>>whole thing easier to handle but also is more transparent for
>>>users. They have one single place to look for logicsheets.
>>>      
>>>
>>Hm... I think it's hard to classify...
>>
>>Do you also want to move the e.g. ESQL logicsheet into
>>the XSP block? IMO that would not be a good idea.
>>    
>>
>
>True...hmm...ok, then whoever does it should decide :)
>
>  
>
I see your point of placing the burden of dependencies with xsp though. 
We could take that as a guideline whenever there isn't a clear reason to 
do otherwise.

--
Unico

Mime
View raw message