cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sylvain Wallez <sylv...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute on in status.xml
Date Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:49:29 GMT
Reinhard Pötz wrote:

> Sylvain Wallez wrote:


<snip/>

>>
>> - do you want to add an importance="high|low|medium" attribute on 
>> <action> in changes.xml?
>
>
> I think high|low|medium should me more meaningful or in other words 
> self-explaining. What about "newFeature", "incompatibleChange", 
> "minorChange"?


These words are too specific, or indicate a different classification. 
For example, the new forms block is a "newFeature", just as is the 
ability to set the output encoding on JSPReader. But the first one is 
really important (should appear in announcement) whereas the second is not.

Sylvain

-- 
Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }


Mime
View raw message