cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reinhard Pötz <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Rename Rhino-with-continuations packages
Date Mon, 08 Mar 2004 08:38:17 GMT
Antonio Gallardo wrote:

>I understand the POV. On the one hand the need to allow BEA and IBM use
>Flow. I think it is great! And I am +1 here.
>On the other side, I don't like the forking idea (as I don't liked it in
>jisp). I know we currently use a forked version, but giving it a
>"official" status is what I don't like. Here I am totally "-1".
I see your point and if we had designed it on the whiteboard it would be 
different. But that's life ;-)

>As a fair consesus, I choosed to vote -0 on this. It will not block the
>change, but I simply don't like the solution. I am not voting a full "-1".
>It is just "-0". I hope it show my POV. :-D
>If you wish, you can ignore my -0, anyway it will not block nothing at all.
Thanks Antonio.


View raw message