cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Cocoon Forms namespaces (was: [SUMMARY] From Woody to Cocoon Forms 1.0)
Date Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:54:25 GMT
Reinhard Pötz wrote:

> Marc Portier wrote:
> 
>> Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>>
>>> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>>>
>>>> Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Tim Larson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> +1 'cforms' instead of just 'forms'
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm +1 for "forms" only - as Vadim pointed out, it's "Cocoon" is 
>>>>> obvious because it's within the Cocoon CVS.
>>>>> WDOT?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok, we (where we stands for Vadim, Tim, Bertrand, and Rolf) had a 
>>>> little chat on IRC and agreed on the following:
>>>>
>>>>   Block Title: Cocoon Forms, or Cocoon Forms 1.0
>>>>   Block Name: cforms
>>>>   Package: org.apache.cocoon.cforms
>>>>   Namespace: http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0
>>>
>>>
>>
>> sorry for missing the argumentation on keeping the 'forms' here, or is 
>> this a typo?
>>
>>>>   NS Prefix: fd
>>>
>>>
>> and similar for binding and templating I presume? we might question if 
>> reordering the sub-domain and version-no is not more natural then:
>>
>> xmlns:fd=http://apache.org/cocoon/cforms/1.0/definition
>> xmlns:fb=http://apache.org/cocoon/cforms/1.0/binding
> 
> 
> I like it, but I'm no specialist on those things.
> Stefano, IIRC you did some research on namespaces for Cocoon Blocks, WDYT?

I would do

   http://apache.org/cocoon/cforms/1.0#definition

so that in the future there is an algorithmical way to get to the version.

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message