cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heini...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: [SUMMARY] From Woody to Cocoon Forms 1.0
Date Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:44:23 GMT
On 05.03.2004 19:49, Tim Larson wrote:

>>  Package: org.apache.cocoon.cforms
>>
>>here I would go "forms" instead. package naming is where the estate 
>>really is, where class collissions might happen.
> 
> 
> I understand how this seems like a good place for the battleground,
> but to introduce a new winner it looks like this would force us to
> break code compiled against the previous major version because we
> would be stealing the class and interface names for the new version.
> Does the new block system somehow solve this problem like via
> classloaders or something else?

This was exactly the reason I liked the cforms in the package name more 
than just forms. BTW, why plural (c)forms instead of singular (c)form?

Joerg

Mime
View raw message