cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Portier <...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: [SUMMARY] From Woody to Cocoon Forms 1.0
Date Fri, 05 Mar 2004 17:00:18 GMT


Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> 
>> Marc Portier <mpo <at> outerthought.org> writes:
>>
>>  
>>
>>>>> Ok, we (where we stands for Vadim, Tim, Bertrand, and Rolf) had a 
>>>>> little chat on IRC and agreed on the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Block Title: Cocoon Forms, or Cocoon Forms 1.0
>>>>>  Block Name: cforms
>>>>>  Package: org.apache.cocoon.cforms
>>>>>  Namespace: http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0
>>>>>       
>>>
>>> sorry for missing the argumentation on keeping the 'forms' here, or 
>>> is this a typo?
>>>   
>>
>>
>> AFAIU it this is by intention, no typo. It means the implementation of 
>> a new
>>  
>>
> 
> Yes, no typo. Cocoon Forms 1.0 is the one and only form framework for 
> Cocoon at the moment. Thus namespace is ...cocoon/forms/.../1.0 Once we 
> have new-kid-on-the-block replacement for the Cocoon Forms 1.0, it will 
> be named Cocoon Forms 2.0 and have namespace .../cocoon/forms/.../2.0
> 

thx for clarifying

(btw: any takers for my other remark on the order of version-number and 
cforms-subdomain?)

> 
>> form framework can happen in a parallel block, but the namespace 
>> always points
>> to *the* form framework. For a new framework accepted as replacement 
>> for Woody
>> later on the namespace will just change to 2.0.
>>
>> +1 from me for the proposal (no IRC possible from here)
>>
>> Joerg
>>
> 
> 
> Vadim
> 

-marc=
-- 
Marc Portier                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at                http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/
mpo@outerthought.org                              mpo@apache.org


Mime
View raw message