cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reinhard Pötz <reinh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [SUMMARY] From Woody to Cocoon Forms 1.0
Date Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:30:57 GMT
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

> Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>
>> Tim Larson wrote:
>
>
> ...
>
>>> +1 'cforms' instead of just 'forms'
>>
>> I'm +1 for "forms" only - as Vadim pointed out, it's "Cocoon" is 
>> obvious because it's within the Cocoon CVS.
>> WDOT?
>
>
>
> Ok, we (where we stands for Vadim, Tim, Bertrand, and Rolf) had a 
> little chat on IRC and agreed on the following:
>
>   Block Title: Cocoon Forms, or Cocoon Forms 1.0
>   Block Name: cforms
>   Package: org.apache.cocoon.cforms
>   Namespace: http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0
>   NS Prefix: fd
>
> Title goes to documentation, samples, wiki, etc. Package name "cforms" 
> and block name "cforms" will allow possibility of parallel development 
> of the next generation "Cocoon Forms 2.0" (block name dforms ;-)), 
> when/if it happens. Namespace suggests that Cocoon Forms 1.0 is one 
> and only official forms framework. Namespace prefix "fd" stands for 
> "forms definition".
>
> Do we have a consensus now? Please chime in on IRC (somebody will have 
> to count votes then), or here :-)
>
> Vadim
>
+1 from me!

-- 
Reinhard


Mime
View raw message