cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Antonio Gallardo" <agalla...@agssa.net>
Subject Re: java continuations
Date Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:44:55 GMT
Joerg Heinicke dijo:
> On 29.03.2004 20:39, Stephan Michels wrote:
>
>>>Hmm, 4h for a vote was a bit short, wasn't it? So just for the records:
>>>I'm with Antonio and so like JFlow vs. JSFlow.
>>
>>
>> I know, I know, sorry about that, guys. I was very impatient. I could
>> revert it if you want.
>
> Not because of my comment. If the vote majority will shift to another
> name instead of javaflow we can still move it around. If Carsten does
> not insist on his -1 including a removal I would let it at the place
> where it is at the moment.

I am with Carsten too. Note he is just against the right place to put it.
That is all. Think in newbies.....

You will see a big neon: "JavaFlow" inside blocks and none telling you
"JavascriptFlow". Also BTW, If one will be called JavaFlow, then the over
must be called using the ugly large name: "Javascriptflow".

This is why I prefer: JFlow and JSFlow.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo

Mime
View raw message