cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Larson <...@keow.org>
Subject Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute on in status.xml
Date Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:51:46 GMT
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 03:37:11PM +0100, Reinhard P?tz wrote:
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>
> >So let's finally vote on this.
> >
> >- do you want to add an importance="high|low|medium" attribute on 
> ><action> in changes.xml?
> 
> I think high|low|medium should me more meaningful or in other words 
> self-explaining. What about "newFeature", "incompatibleChange", 
> "minorChange"?

This would change "importance" to something like "changeType", right?

+1 with self-explaining names (even if I am not good at choosing them :)

> >- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
> 
> As long as we dont have RCB (real Cocoon blocks) I'm in favour of Vadims 
> proposal.

+1 to block attribute

--Tim Larson

Mime
View raw message