cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Larson <...@keow.org>
Subject Re: From Woody to CocoonForms
Date Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:25:58 GMT
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:15:56PM +0100, Reinhard P?tz wrote:
> Tim Larson wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:05:38PM +0100, Marc Portier wrote:
> >>Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >>>H.vanderLinden@MI.unimaas.nl wrote:
> >>>>Hi,
> >>>>>In the next few days I want (no promise ;-) to start with renaming

> >>>>>Woody to CocoonForms. First I want to move the _core_ which means

> >>>>>that I want to make one simple example run.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>namespaces:
> >>>>>http://apache.org/cocoon/woody/definition/1.0
> >>>>>-->
> >>>>>http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>Are there other 'forms' types? Maybe you could use "cforms" since that

> >>>>is the most often used abbreviation and to set it apart from other 
> >>>>form types.
> >>>>
> >>>+1 (although I'm one of those that will miss "woody")
> >>>
> >>another +1 to 'cforms' over 'forms'
> >>(and joining in on the 'will miss the original')
> >
> >+1 'cforms' instead of just 'forms'
> >
> I'm +1 for "forms" only - as Vadim pointed out, it's "Cocoon" is obvious 
> because it's within the Cocoon CVS.
> WDOT?

I could be wrong (that happens often enough), but what if we eventually
replace Woody/Cocoon Forms with something better?  If it is very
different then IMHO just a namespace version change 1.0->2.0, etc. may
not make a lot of sense.  A new name may be in order at that point.
If we start the pattern with CForms then we have a non-fantasy name,
while still leaving room for future names for new forms frameworks
(Super Forms -> SForms, etc.)

I'll be quiet now :)

--Tim Larson

Mime
View raw message