cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsber...@STJUDE.ORG>
Subject RE: [Kernel2.2] Comments
Date Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:43:46 GMT
Leo Sutic <leo.sutic@inspireinfrastructure.com> writes:

<big snip/>

> My whole argument is that your design will end up being very very 
> complicated and very very hard to develop for, since it 
> provides so few 
> guarantees to block developers. Things like "what code is 
> running", for
> example.

So if you've got something for which blocks are not suited (like perhaps
SSL, or a DB pool), don't use blocks; use modules or whatever it is that
does give you the contract you want.  The rest of Cocoon isn't going
away...



Mime
View raw message