Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3149 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2004 04:57:13 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2004 04:57:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 64905 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2004 04:56:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 64729 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2004 04:56:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 64680 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2004 04:56:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kazexch02.adl.aspect.com.au) (139.130.136.221) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2004 04:56:46 -0000 Message-ID: <87E364511228FB4185BC4E7856693D90043983@aspcbr-mail.cbr.aspect.com.au> From: Dean Cording To: "'dev@cocoon.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Future of XSP and ESQL [was Re: An idea - transformer logicsh eets.] Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:24:01 +1030 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > > > I think that the ESQL logicsheet is the only really valuable and > > > unique thing that we have in XSP, so, yeah, I totally > > understand your > > > concern. > > Ryan Hoegg wrote: > > > Why not pull the ESQL stuff out and provide a stripped down > > ESQLTransformer? > > I haven't used ESQL (I've tried to avoid XSP from day one), > but what does it do that the existing SQLTransformer can't? > Lots. Handles sql errors much better than SQLTransformer for a start. ************************************************************************ MIMEsweeper has been used to check this email for security ************************************************************************