Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94856 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2004 19:43:00 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 19:43:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 15849 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2004 19:42:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 15798 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2004 19:42:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 15783 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2004 19:42:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.datazug.ch) (212.4.65.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 19:42:46 -0000 Received: from yahoo.de [212.4.78.165] by mail.datazug.ch with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id ADBA7420198; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:42:50 +0100 Message-ID: <403F9DB9.2040207@yahoo.de> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:42:49 +0100 From: "J.Pietschmann" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: PDF Encryption References: <403B475F.30503@fztig938.bank.dresdner.net> <403E12E0.10609@vafer.org> <403E40CA.8040002@yahoo.de> <403E623C.3080709@vafer.org> <403F8C4D.3090809@yahoo.de> <403F95CF.8050007@vafer.org> In-Reply-To: <403F95CF.8050007@vafer.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Torsten Curdt wrote: > From the FOP documentation I got the impression I could > pass them as shown in the wiki. But does that mean these [1] > are the only options besides fonts that are currently available? Yes. > Without diving into the fop codebase - is it much work to add? How much is "much"? It would require hacking several files and some reengineering of the tests whether encryption is available which are currently in the CLI class. Given that encryption has several major deficiencies in the maintenance branch code and that the code is to be abandoned anyway, I don't think it will be done. J.Pietschmann